Health regulators watchdog publishes performance review of NMC

A report by the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence (CHRE), the ‘watchdog’ of the UK’s nine health professional regulatory bodies, concludes that the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) has made ‘significant progress’ over the last year.

The report, ‘Performance review of health professional regulatory bodies 2008/09’, comments that “This has been a challenging and transformative year for the Nursing and Midwifery Council. We are pleased to report on the significant progress it has made in reforming its governance and practice”.

The CHRE performance review also notes that the NMC has ‘…demonstrated excellence or good practice in aspects of its performance….’ and highlights:

• The accessibility of professional standards;
• The development of specific guidance on the care of older people;
• Requiring nurses and midwives to sign a personal declaration that they will conform to the ‘The Code: Standards of Conduct, Performance and Ethics for Nurses and Midwives’ at all times;
• Undertaking photographic checks using the British Council’s online checking system for non-EU applicants to register and;
• The use of an expert panel of people with disabilities to inform our work on the NMC’s disability equality scheme.

However, the Royal College of Nursing says there is still room for improvement in the NMC and has described waiting times for fitness to practice hearings as ‘worrying’.

The report is available on CHRE’s website at www.chre.org.uk

Wales Centre for Health commits to eradicating child poverty in Wales

The Wales Centre for Health has stated its commitment to eradicating child poverty in Wales by signing up to the Welsh Assembly Government’s Child Poverty Joint Agreement.

Many organisations are already committed to tackling child poverty through the Children and Young People’s Planning process. The aim of the Joint Agreement is to ensure that all public organisations that can influence the outcomes of children living in poverty co-operate to prioritise their needs.

By signing the Joint Agreement, organisations confirm that they will support and assist the Welsh Assembly Government to take forward the three strand approach to reducing child poverty outlined in the Joint Agreement Document, and ensure that, as far as possible, the policies and initiatives developed by their organisation will make a positive impact on the lives of children and young people living in poverty.

The Welsh Assembly Government is committed to eradicating child poverty in Wales by 2020 and halving it (against the 1997 rate) by 2010.

Mother and Baby survey reveals mothers worries about breastfeeding in public

A new Mother and Baby survey, carried out in conjunction with NCT, reveals that most British women still feel uncomfortable breastfeeding in public.

The survey, of over 1,200 mums, discovered that 60 per cent feel that the UK isn’t breastfeeding friendly. It also found that 65 per cent felt so strongly about it that they don’t even intend to try breastfeeding because they feel too self-conscious about people staring at them.

65 per cent of those questioned felt that they would feel more encouraged to try breastfeeding if there was a more relaxed attitude towards it among the general public. 30 per cent also thought attitudes towards breastfeeding are more positive abroad.

Two thirds of mothers who did choose to breastfeed said feeding their baby in public had been a stressful experience[l1] . Over half (54 per cent) have been asked to move on from a restaurant, cafe or coffee shop and 30 per cent have been asked to move in a shopping centre.

London came out on top as the place where mums feel most comfortable breastfeeding in public with no-one reporting that they had been asked to move on from feeding in a public place.

The North West (64.8%) and West Midlands (63.3%) were considered the most stressful areas to be a breastfeeding mum.

Women in Scotland didn’t care who saw them and felt most confident about breast feeding in front of other people – with 60 per cent not worrying who saw them. Mums in Wales feel the most supported by specialist GP and health visitors with 73 per cent feeling that they received all the support they needed. Only half of breastfeeding mums in the North felt supported.

70 per cent of mums said celebrities should breastfeed in public to help encourage acceptance.

Notes:

The survey was conducted by Mother  & Baby magazine and online at www.askamum.com and NCT website www.nct.org.uk

1236 replies were received.

Mother & Baby magazine is published monthly by Bauer Media.

COW and GATE found guilty of misusing research to sell their brands of formula milks

Cow & Gate this week had a complaint against their advertising of follow on milk upheld by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). The ruling states that Cow & Gate’s claim that their follow-on milk “support[s] your baby’s natural immune system” is unsubstantiated. This complaint was brought by the NCT.  Baby Milk Action has also won a similar ASA ruling about Aptamil’s follow-on milk advertising.

NCT lodged a complaint with the ASA in July 2007 pointing out that Cow & Gate’s claim was unproven. The evidence that the company provided, purporting to support their claims, was based on a study which was not relevant for this product because:

• Follow-on milk is for babies who are aged 6 months or over. The study used as a basis by Cow & Gate for this claim recruited babies less than 4 months old who were fed on formula milk, not follow-on milk.
• The product in the study was different from the product being advertised with the claim. The formula milk provided to the babies in the study contained extensively hydrolysed cow’s milk*. Neither Cow & Gate’s formula milk, nor its follow-on milk contains cow’s milk that is extensively hydrolysed.
• The findings of the study are not necessarily relevant to babies who are not susceptible to allergies.  Because the babies selected to be part of the study, were all susceptible to having allergies (either a parent or a sibling had an allergy).

The ASA stated that Nutricia (manufacturer of Cow & Gate) needs to hold robust evidence to support their claims in any future advertising.

Parents are best served by talking to healthcare professionals and other bodies without a financial interest in formula, for their information.  By its nature, advertising is never impartial.

*Hydrolysing is where protein is broken down into amino acids and short chain peptides.

The Scientific Advisory Committee (SACN) which advises the government on nutrition, points out that the use of claims is ‘entirely unsupportable’. If an ingredient is beneficial it should be included in all formula milks. They said “We find the case for labeling infant formula or follow on formula with health or nutrition claims entirely unsupportable. If an ingredient is unequivocally beneficial as demonstrated by independent review of scientific data it would be unethical to withhold it for commercial reasons. Rather it should be made a required ingredient of infant formula in order to reduce existing risks associated with artificial feeding. To do otherwise is not in the best interests of children, and fails to recognise the crucial distinction between these products and other foods.”

www.sacn.gov.uk/pdfs/position_statement_2007_09_24.pdf

Report published on women’s satisfaction levels with maternity care in Wales

Most women are satisfied with maternity care in Wales with services generally meeting an appropriate standard, says a report published this week by the Auditor General. But the report also highlights some specific problems including the way that labour is managed in some trusts and dissatisfaction with support for infant feeding.

The report includes a survey of new mothers and although many women questioned were satisfied with their experience, a significant minority felt they were not always treated with dignity and respect or kindness and understanding.

Antenatal care generally meets good practice guidelines, but some women do not receive enough check-ups and there is generally low attendance at antenatal classes. The report also shows that women in some trusts tend to receive too many scans whilst trusts are not yet offering the most up-to-date screening for Down’s syndrome.

The way labour is managed in some NHS trusts gives rise to concern. A significant minority of women felt they were left alone and worried during or shortly after labour and some trusts could do more to prevent unnecessary Caesarean sections. Women were least satisfied with the postnatal phase of care, with over a third of women being unhappy with the quality of support they received for infant feeding.

The report calls for the Assembly Government to develop an overall strategy for maternity services in Wales. This would help the planning of maternity services which is currently being undermined by the lack of a clear vision and poor information about the cost and quality of care.

The strategy would also provide a comprehensive source of guidance aimed at removing some of the specific problems with maternity services, such as the failure to meet recommended staffing levels in some trusts and the low level of staff training in many trusts.

The report called Maternity Services makes a number of recommendations for improvement, by calling on:

• the Assembly Government to develop a comprehensive strategy for maternity services, highlighting good practice and offering guidance on local service planning
• new local health boards to assess staffing requirements for delivering safe and high quality services
• local health boards to make sure that all maternity staff receive the necessary clinical training
• local health boards to review their training programmes to ensure that there is sufficient focus on the principles of respect, well being, choice and dignity
• the Assembly Government, in partnership with the NHS in Wales and other key stakeholders, to agree a standard set of data that is routinely collected, monitored and used to support service improvement.

RCOG reports on older mothers

In response to growing concern over the rising incidence of later maternal age in the UK, the RCOG convened a Study Group to meet to discuss the issues. Research shows there is a growing trend in the UK for childbearing to occur at a later time in women’s lives and the RCOG says there is an urgent need for better public information on the issues surrounding later maternity.  The RCOG report that whilst women should be supported, rather than constrained, in their life choices, both women and society need to be aware of the possible problems that older mothers may encounter.
 
RCOG reports that later maternal age is an emerging public health issue and organisations such as themselves, NICE and the Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE) must work together with the Department of Health to tackle these new challenges. 

Research into impact of independent midwifery care published

The British Medical Journal this week published research comparing care provided by independent midwives with maternity care within the NHS. The research compared a wide range of ‘outcomes’ including whether mothers started labour spontaneously, whether their birth was spontaneous, without forceps, ventouse or caesarean section,  where drugs were used for pain relief, and breastfeeding rates. It found that women who used an independent midwife (i.e. a midwife registered with the Independent Midwives Association) were more likely to start labour spontaneously, have an unassisted vaginal birth, use fewer pain relieving drugs and were much more likely to establish breastfeeding.
 
For women with a straightforward pregnancy the stillbirth and neonatal death rate was similar to that for women having their baby with NHS care. There appeared to be more baby deaths among women who had a more complex pregnancy with an independent midwife. Unfortunately the methodology used was unable to compare accurately the women having care with an independent midwife with those using NHS services. Although the sample was matched in terms of age, previous children, year of birth and socioeconomic status there are likely to be many other ways in which the two groups differ, including different beliefs and preferences, making it difficult to make meaningful comparisons.

Government commitment on child poverty to be enshrined in law

The Government has published a landmark child poverty bill that enshrines in law a duty to eradicate child poverty by 2020 – so that all children have the best start in life and have the opportunities to flourish. The cross departmental bill requires Government to reduce poverty so families on low income do not get left behind. It puts duties on local authorities, and partner organisations like the NHS and Police to work together at local level to lift children out of poverty. It also requires Government to report to Parliament each year on progress and creates a new expert Child Poverty Commission to publish advice and encourage progress.

500,000 children have been lifted out of poverty already and measures currently in train are expected to lift around a further half a million children out of poverty. The target for relative poverty requires the UK to go further than the best currently being achieved in Denmark, Finland and other European countries.

In summary the UK-wide Bill will:

• Establish four income targets to be met by 2020, which will define the eradication of child poverty; Relative poverty: Less than 10 per cent of children living in relative low income poverty by 2020 (i.e. in households with less that 60 per cent of the median income); Material Deprivation: Less than 5 per cent of children living in combined material deprivation and low income (i.e. in households with less than 70 per cent of median income); Persistent Poverty: percentage of children living in relative poverty for three out of four years (target level to be set by the end of 2014 as data are currently unavailable); Absolute low income: less that 5 percent of children living in families with an income below an absolute threshold.

• Require the Government to publish a UK child poverty strategy, which must be revised every three years. The strategy will set out the policies that will put in place to meet the targets.  There will also be a requirement for Scottish ministers and Northern Irish ministers to publish child poverty strategies and the establishment of a child poverty Commission to provide advice on the development of the child poverty strategies.

• Require the Government to publish annual progress reports. Place duties on local authorities and other local delivery partners to work together to tackle child poverty, conduct a local needs assessment, produce a child poverty strategy and take child poverty into account in the production and revision of their Sustainable Communities Strategies.

The Government is also announcing the pilot areas that were selected for an innovative scheme which gives local authorities the opportunity to draw up individual plans to tackle local child poverty issues and the areas to benefit from targeted accommodation support for teenage parents.

‘Take Up the Challenge’, the report from the Take Up Taskforce outlines how local services can help poor families to take up their financial entitlements, illustrated by examples of local approaches that are having a real impact. Increasing the take up of benefits and tax credits is an important part of the Government’s strategy, and is particularly important to help vulnerable families through a time of economic uncertainty. This report will help local authorities and partners meet the requirements of the Bill.

Details on the Child Poverty Bill and the Take Up Taskforce’s report can be found at http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/ecm/childpoverty

There are currently 42 Local Authorities running pilots.

HMRC Outreach Pilot: The HRMC Outreach pilot tests whether providing tax credit advice in Children’s Centres will assist in the take up and best use of tax credits for families, ensuring that families in poverty are claiming all that they are entitled to claim to better support them. The HMRC-led and funded pilot began in five Children’s Centres in Preston and Newham in May 2008 has been extended, from April 2009, to 100 Children’s Centres in the West Midlands, NW Lancashire and London areas.

Work Focused Services Pilot: This pilot, led by DWP and DCSF is testing whether placing JobCentrePlus (JCP) advisors in Children’s Centres, along with additional support aimed at getting more people into employment .It was launched in 10 Local Authorities and 30 Children Centres in January 2009 and early anecdotal evidence is showing that parents are making good use of the service and support provided in their Sure Start Children’s Centre.

Family Intervention Pilot: The DCSF has been running the successful Family Intervention Project (FIP) programme since July 2008 and in October of the same year, funding was made available for 10 local authorities to run a FIP programme specifically aimed at supporting families who experience poverty, inter-generational worklessness and other complex needs. Once fully launched, it will be operating in 32 areas with each area working with 40-60 families. It was launched in October 2008 in 10 areas which each area working with 15-20 families. 2 more projects are scheduled to be operational by September 2009.
Child Development Grant Pilots: The Child Development Grant Pilots provides incentive based programmes, aimed at encouraging hard to reach parents to engage in a number of positive activities to help lift them and their families out of poverty. The pilot will run for two years in ten Local Authorities.

Local Area Innovation pilots: In ten LAs, the Local Area Innovation Pilots give local authorities and their partners the chance to draw up new and innovative programmes to help tackle local child poverty issues. The pilots will seek to encourage movement into employment, increase the take-up of benefits and help to raise incomes through measures tailored to support the local authority.

Supported accommodation for teenage parents: In May and June 2009, seven local authorities will test how providing enhanced support for teenage parents’ housing needs can help improve outcomes for teenage parents and their children. The pilots will help to define the best ways of offering enhanced support.

Debate regarding family benefits and absent teenage fathers

Graham Allen MP this week introduced a debate on family benefits and absent teenage fathers.  He used the opportunity to highlight the fact that there is often an assumption that girls should take responsibility for avoiding unwanted pregnancy, and caring for the baby if they fail and that Nottingham has created a teenage pregnancy taskforce to address the issue.

He expressed his concern that most teenage mothers in Nottingham were raising their child on their own, and that relationships between teenage parents were generally unstable. He argued that teenage fathers are themselves children. “That is the central dilemma for social policy generally and the benefits system in particular,” he said. Allen urged the government to encourage teen fathers to do the best they can for their children, emotionally and financially. The new Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission has the opportunity to make this agenda its own, he said.

Many young fathers feel that the benefits system is complicated and financially burdensome, he said. And, the system does not provide the social and emotional basis for fathers who have no chance of making payments, to make informed decisions. A “one-stop office” for young fathers could offer advice and support and a medium through which to make maintenance payments, he suggested.

Tackling teenage pregnancies and absentee fathers also requires supporting young people before pregnancy occurs. “If young people have the ability to interact, to learn and to resolve arguments without violence…it is virtually impossible to fail in terms of educational attainment, aspiration to work and raising a decent family,” he said.  And, more must be done to encourage teenage boys to delay sexual activity, Allen argued.

In response Kitty Usher, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP), acknowledged that the benefits system does remain complex.  She said that the system must be simpler, well targeted and empowering but that the government recognises that families are more diverse than ever – Public services and the workplace must reflect those changes across society, Ussher said.

She noted that local services should take a “much more proactive approach to identifying young fathers” through the common assessment framework and targeted youth support arrangements and that the Welfare Reform Bill contains significant change on joint birth registration – an unmarried father’s name cannot appear on the birth certificate without his knowledge. “One aim of the joint birth registration provision is that an unmarried father who registers his child’s birth will acquire parental responsibility,” she said.  She also stressed that the Child Support Agency’s (CSA) role is to alleviate child poverty by ensuring that money flows to children.

Changes to Government Ministers and Departments

Last week saw some big changes to Government including a Cabinet reshuffle and the development of a new department.  The reshuffle saw the replacement of Health Secretary, Alan Johnson who becomes Home Secretary, with Andy Burnham. Other key changes include Yvette Cooper replacing James Purnell as Work and Pensions secretary and Ben Bradshaw becoming culture, media and sport secretary in place of Andy Burnham. Dawn Primarolo, previously Minister of State for Health, is now the Minister for Children replacing Beverley Hughes who has resigned from Cabinet. Ms Primarolo’s replacement has yet to be announced.

The Government has also created a new Department for Business, Innovation and Skills whose key role will be to build Britain’s capabilities to compete in the global economy. The Department will be created by merging Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) and Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS) into a single department committed to building Britain’s future economic strengths. To compete in a global economy and create the jobs of the future Britain requires a regulatory environment that encourages enterprise, skilled people, innovation, and world-class science and research.

The merger of BERR and DIUS brings together the parts of the government with key expertise in these areas. It combines BERR’s strengths in shaping the enterprise environment, analysing the strengths and needs of the various parts of British industry, building strategies for industrial strength and expertise in better regulation with DIUS’s expertise in maintaining world class universities, expanding access to higher education, investing in the UK’s science base and shaping skills policy and innovation through bodies such as the Technology Strategy Board. It also puts the UK’s Further Education system and universities closer to the heart of government thinking about building now for the upturn.

The new department will:

• Advocate the needs of business across government, especially of UK small businesses;
• Promote an enterprise environment that is good for business and good for consumers;
• Design tailored policies for sectors of the UK economy that represent key future strengths and where government policy can add to the dynamics of the market;
• Assess the changing skills needs of the UK economy, especially the intermediate and high skills vital in a global economy and design policies to meets them through public and privately funded life long training;
• Invest in the development of a higher education system committed to widening participation, equipping people with the skills and knowledge to compete in a global economy and securing and enhancing Britain’s existing world class research base;
• Continue to invest in the UK’s world class science base and develop strategies for commercialising more of that science;
• Continue to invest in skills through the Further Education system to help people through the downturn and to prepare Britain for the future;
• Deliver on the government’s ambitious objectives to expand the number of apprenticeships;
• Encourage innovation in the UK;
• Defend a sound regulatory environment that encourages enterprise and skills;
• Collaborate with the RDAs in building economic growth in the English regions;
• Work with the EU in shaping European regulation and European policies that affect the openness of the single market and the competitiveness of European and British companies
• Continue to work to expand UK exports and encourage inward investment to the UK.